Is that putting it up for review? Or are you not doing a PR workflow at all, in which case this doesn't really relate to the article.
Is the expectation that the developer either never commits stuff in a broken state during development or that they go back and rewrite or squash the sequence before pushing it for review?
Is that putting it up for review? Or are you not doing a PR workflow at all, in which case this doesn't really relate to the article.
Is the expectation that the developer either never commits stuff in a broken state during development or that they go back and rewrite or squash the sequence before pushing it for review?