My point is that it's typically a design choice when choosing something like Wordpress or a dynamic site, versus a static HTML file that's under 100kb. Though in this case the site's resources are under 400KB, so I can't really be sure.
Nobody's saying a static site has to be under 100kb or whatever. You can have a static site that has 100Mb+ of assets. You can put whatever design you want on a static site, it doesn't have to be minimalist and without images.
