The original fragments of this text are no longer available after it was denounced as a hoax over 150 years ago. This researcher’s claims are mainly based on the content of the text, which he says are echoed by later texts and have multiple coincidences. The article says that the researchers who focus on Biblical text origins are more convinced and the ones focused on physical details of the documents are less convinced as they “contain all the hallmarks of a modern forgery.” The response is that the transcriptions may not be accurate representations of the actual fragment.
It all seems very difficult to prove and the implications, a version of the Torah with most of the laws removed, just a little too convenient. Seems like healthy skepticism is warranted here.
Too convenient now, but back when it was discovered, it would have been way more convenient if its contents fit the mainstream consensus at that time instead.
So, the mainstream consensus at that time was that the traditional date for deuteronomy should be replaced by a later date , based on historical-critical methods. These same dates and theories enjoy considerable love today. If the shapira fragments are a 9th century BC copy of deuteronomy, modern historical critical thoughts about the composition and dating of the pentateuch are wrong.
Edit: Not a consensus I guess but the documentary hypothesis was emerging in the 1860s and 1870s shortly before these fragments made their debut.
It is mentioned in the article. Dershowitz feared he might be considered a crackpot until he had all the evidence together, organized, and presentable at once. Revealing partial research before he completed everything would make a less persuasive case.
There's also a cloak-and-dagger aspect to scholarship about ancient manuscripts, especially scriptures, which pops up in various stories here from time to time. Lots of intrigue, theft, forgery, factions, and weirdness. Partly this has to do with the overlap with the antiquities markets which are more...colorful.
The transparency and openness we tend to expect from academic research is lacking. Sources are closely guarded, scholars don't get to properly check each other's work, and drama regularly ensues.
Edit: I was trying to dig up an old thread about some such weird controversy involving National Geographic, but my memory has disintegrated into little parchment fragments. Speaking of cloak-and-dagger, though, I did run across this:
When I was a graduate student, one of my advisors tried to steer me away from focusing on periods of history where textual sources are/were more, shall we say, fluid. (In my particular case, this was Warring States China - I ended up pursuing early medieval Chinese literature so it was moot anyways). The point here is that academic careers are made or broken and some research is totally discredited while other research gains more prominence on the back of the vagaries of archaeological finds and determinations of authenticity. Within that the world, the stakes are extremely high.
> I ended up pursuing early medieval Chinese literature
I read https://www.amazon.com/dp/1624666302/ (Selections from the Taiping Guangji, by Ditter, Choo, and Allen) and would love to find more books like it. It translates some stories and prefaces each one with introductory and explanatory material covering concepts used in the story ("侠 has referred to different things over the centuries..." / "most animals are depicted as being able to take human or animal form at will, but tigers are an exception, requiring their skins to resume animal form" / "readers would have recognized that the neighborhood the protagonist lives in is, while not especially well-off itself, physically next to an extremely wealthy neighborhood" / "the tiger uses 'inclination toward mountains and forests' literally, and her husband interprets it differently because this is a conventional expression referring to the retirement of an official from public life").
The introductory/explanatory material adds an incredible amount of value for me. Might you be able to recommend anything similar?
One recommendation I have (although I'm not sure if it fits the bill here) is Stephen Owen's Anthology of Chinese Literature. Owen is a total genius (speaking of the Taiping Guangji, I remember sitting in a seminar with him where he'd ad-lib these incredible translations of similar stories from a slightly earlier collection that I'd struggled with for hours), and it's not often that so magnificent a scholar will write a relatively introductory work. The book is a lot broader than the one you mentioned, so the explanatory material and annotations are necessarily a little bit briefer, but I find that Owen does a good job of putting each of the works in context and pointing out particularly notable points of poetry or prose. If you do have a more specific period interest I'd be happy to provide a more accurate recommendation (although I know very little about scholarship on anything written in the last millennium or so, ha!)
>“This cave was robbed by Bedouins maybe 40 years ago,” explains Price, an American archaeologist and research professor at Liberty University in Virginia. “Fortunately for us, they didn’t dig very deep. Our hope is that if we keep digging, we hit the mother lode.”
In other words, everyone that came before us were robbers (despite living here). We alone are allowed to profit from historical artifacts (despite living on another continent).
It could be real, could be fake. Theirs lots of evidence for it being fake which the new work doesnt adequately deal with.
If they are real, it poses problems for modern critical scholarship because the words for god are not sympathetic with modern theories and establishes a date for deuteronomy far earlier than modern critical scholarship supports.
On the other hand, they're very likely a forgery - the motivation for the forger would be to validate traditional dates for deuteronomy vs modern critical dates that are much earlier.
Even in rabbinic Hebrew, the name for this script is כתב עברי (Hebrew writing), and the name for the script used today is כתב אשורית (Assyrian writing).
Hypothesis: the physical medium was a forgery, but the text was not. In other words: it was a copy of a genuine manuscrit. That would explain why the physical scroll appears to be an obvious forgery containing, retrospectively, a perplexing text.
Why would anyone go through the pains of forgery to create a copy of an original in their possession? Just sell the original if you're in or for quick money, show off your original (and sell clean copies) if you're out for status.
If this sort of thing interests you, check out Veritas: A Harvard Professor, a Con Man and the Gospel of Jesus's Wife by Ariel Sabar. Interesting story and a great read - just when you think you understand it, a new layer appears.
"And in a 2018 scholarly article, he used similar approach to advance a startling claim: that an earlier version of Leviticus, rather than forbidding sex between men, had actually permitted it."
I'm a poor scholar of the ancient Jewish faith, but explicit permission of male on male sexual intercourse in the five books seems a bit of a stretch.
While I'd like to judge the merits of this man's claims, this has echos of the whole "Jesus wife" fiasco of seeking attention by being edgy.
(Disclaimer: I have no interest in this matter; my interest here is only in the structure of the argument.)
If you follow the link to the 2018 "startling claim" (https://archive.is/QAa5x), what's presented there is not a claim of "explicit permission" as you say, but a reasoning from the principle that "For example, a sign declaring an office to be closed on Sundays suggests that the office is open on all other days of the week". (That is, in that article Idan Dershowitz suggests that an earlier version of Leviticus 18 forbade homosexual incest, which if true would in turn lead to the conclusion that homosexuality wasn't forbidden in general.)
Pretty sure that pertains to the New Testament (e.g. Paul), not the Pentateuch. I don't know the exact timeline, but I don't think the ancient Greeks as we know them were a factor when the Old Testament law was written.
There’s some decent evidence that the Philistines were Greek, although they would have been Greeks before the period when Greeks wrote much about pedastery so your point probably is still valid
> Dershowitz suggests that an earlier version of Leviticus 18 forbade homosexual incest, which if true would in turn lead to the conclusion that homosexuality wasn't forbidden in general.
That's fine as far as it goes, but it seems unlikely that there would be a specific prohibition on homosexual incest as opposed to incest in general.
So, Leviticus doesn't just say "no incest, please"; it has quite a long list of forbidden combinations. 18:7 and 18:14 refer to both male-male and male-female incest but are weirdly worded; Dershowitz's contention is that after the putative addition of 18:22 (the "no sex with men" one) they were reworded to de-emphasise the male part (as, if there's a general prohibition on male-male sex, they'd seem a bit superfluous.)
>"But Dershowitz makes an even more dramatic claim. The text, which he has reconstructed from 19th-century transcriptions and drawings, is not a reworking of Deuteronomy, he argues, but a precursor to it, dating to the period of the First Temple, before the Babylonian Exile. That would make it the oldest known biblical manuscript by far, and an unprecedented window into the origins and evolution of the Bible and biblical religion."
That's fine, if that's what it turns out to be - a precursor to the book of Deuteronomy. But let no one be so foolish as to claim it as holy writ - that was settled a long time ago by the apostle John.
Yes, it would obviously be quite foolish to pretend that that specific bit of ancient manuscript is the unchallengable word of god when that would controvert some other bit of ancient manuscript.
How people make their "fair point" ranges from outright trolling all the way to nuanced, thoughtful discussion, so this objection doesn't carry much weight. The GP comment was obviously flamebait.
"Please don't complain about website formatting, back-button breakage, and similar annoyances. They're too common to be interesting. Exception: when the author is present. Then friendly feedback might be helpful."
And he said unto them, Send me, I pray thee, into the river
Will help and be captured naat] forest and sit in the atri cities.
And the king of Bashan went out to meet him at Salah
And they beat him until he had not left him
Where the whole rabbit cable woke up in hot trouble
Their door and bohemian
Mad and all the cities of Mishar and all of Gilad and all of Bashaz
Ad Selka and Edrei .... Eretz Rafam ... Nam
Is that the cloud of the king of Bashan Titar Harpas remains.
He turned and drove off and sat down in front of Bat Pe'a. And went out
At that time you built a father and women of state towards you
And call upon [them] to eat their altar and eat their altar
And drink of their form, and worship them, and worship them
The women of the state and you will cling to a person with a gap that day
And let them also be angry with you and win over you at the same time
That sieve of Nadla and peace from you I will breathe for bread
The state and the stain you with the sword and sat
From them the slaughter will be very much and the sieve will stop.
And I commanded them at that time to teach you
Hakam and their trial to do in the land which they passed through
Her name is her. Take care you do not add to
His commandment and you shall not be deprived of it. Save your money
Forget it and make a statue for yourself and appoint a pattern
Every symbol whose name resounds in the land
Stretches and which basses underground. And hera
Epic in you and I chased the) as soon as Metz
This benefit land. Knowledge. .. today you will save.
His statutes and commandments to drive will be better for you (and for him)
Prolong their days on the earth, which I will fight for your God
Gave you. Hear Israel Israel their God our God |
Other and love. I will fight your God with all your heart!
And with all your soul to Sad-Zad and be their thing God
Which I pluck today on your heart and you have memorized
To your son and you spoke to them on your Sabbath in your daughter and in your walk.
On the way and in your bed and in your bed and you tied them to a sign.
By you and were under your eye and a reporter (Tam]
For the deeds of your daughter and your value because God has cut you off
You swore with the sword on the day of the crowd and I walked the beach
I will fight and me (you) .. .. at this time because you have been redeemed
From the fire and not. . . . The echo to hand you a thing
I will be wise to say +.
11 4 1 1
and
-... Hear Israel, you have passed today
The Jordan to come to the network of their nobles and themselves awake
You grew up and in hot trouble you will not say in your heart
Most of these hot Gentiles could not register no
Look at them remembering what God did
To Pharaoh and to all their affliction, Yahweh will do no harm
Your enemy because their God is the past before you fire ate.
He will destroy them and destroy them tomorrow before you> too
The leprosy will be sent to them by God until it is lost.
The ghetto that remains in front of you is only fire and ash
His commandments and his law and his imitations which I am from
Jesus and you knew today that you are not in your righteousness God
Your God has given you the land of Hua to inherit it
In me with a hard decapitation from the heat that you came out.
From Egypt to Joses from Mesopotamia you orphaned them.
God. By the sword of the day I ascended the mountain to Kozat the
The two hydrangeas and the leaves were written by all of them
The testimony of God is with you on the Mount of Fire
Bios audience. . . . You whipped them and did
You have a tormentor and I will fall before God chooses
Haber Kash ... And two damp in my hand and see
You have sinned and I will break the two dampness before your eyes
And I will pray for you at that time four days
And Arbaam Lela. And as incense and in mass and in burial
. The lust from Maram seals your God> while
That one said Elham Eli sculpted you two damp
Their stone as rhesus and ascended to me the mountain and the mountain.
And two [sluggish shooting. And God will smite them on the damp
The ten things which I will speak unto you in the mountain
The crowd will be disgusted with me and they are Baran Asher
I did and sanctified Barnea in saying to me God went up
And they shall tread down the earth from the top of your mouth to the gods of your God
And you did not go up and you did not hear easily and said these
To guard you and I will pray for you while standing on the mountain
Arba'am Yom and Arba'am Lela in Gadaks + Vishte.
God also at that time and did not corrupt you
Bow down not in your righteousness your God has given you power to do.
Corps. . . (Only the desire of God) in your father for love
You have chosen a creator after them from all the people +
[Because their God] your God is the God [!) Of their God
And the lord of the Lord God the man and the visible (he
A] went and is the one who did the magnification with you.
And the visible. Your father went down in peace
| To their distress she was moved to be a bone and a multitude of people - because but
[If] we keep the whole commandment which I have
The mitzvah today is to make Ahacham for love
To walk in all his ways and in all his imitation. And leave them.
All the people who place all who will brief all
Runlchem. Bo - will not stabilize. I [Q) before you is honest
P: Your sharpness and whim will be all over the land
Ashner was briefed on it. See you have given before you
Today bless and curse the blessing if you hear
Do not obey me and imitate) and the curse if you do not hear
And ye departed from the way which I commanded you this day
[And was. For God hath brought them unto the land of Asher
You came to her name and gave the blessing
On Mt. (Grom) and the curse on Mt.
(What) past the Jordan through the sun
In the land of the Canaanites we were destroyed. נלנל at. Elani shows up.
And these will stand on the candle Ebal] Rauchen and Bolen
[And the Haggadah which Dan and Naphtali. And these will stand on the harp
Gross Shemen and Judah and Issachar Menashe and Ephraim
And Benjamin. And the Levites stood against the mountain, and were smitten
And said with a loud voice [b) The soft man who will love
Elham Elerno and even to Baro will bow down and with him alone
Will pass and answer all the people] and said Amen> Bless
Ha; there is one who will sanctify the seventh day and sit down
And all the people mocked him, and said, Amen. Blessed Haish]
Respect Abu and his mother and all the people answered and said Amen.
Bless [e) a man who will not sting or gamble
Soul meadow and answered artist. Bless the man who did not
He shall defile one another's wife, and they shall answer every one of them
Artist. Bless the man who will not [envy the other
They answered (all the people and said Am. B! Soft man
Who will not swear by [Q) who to lie and answer all the people
| And said Atan. Bless the man who will not deny
And Lana will lie to one another and all the people will answer and say Amen.
Blessed [the man] who did not raise his eye to H. [Razkesh
The whole people shuddered and answered and said Amen. The man's knee
Who will love Renezhu Nuenuz all the people and said
Artist . Bless the man who will establish all my words
This warning to (Eshet) and you and all the people answered
And said Amen. And the Levites gathered and answered [and said in-easy
Ram Raf if he hears you will easily hear your God preserve
Then do all his commandments and come upon you all
Blessing God bless you you burn bless you
In the flesh you bless the tenach and the rest you bless the fruit in your belly.
And the fruit of thy ground which dwelleth:
| You are in Bach and Blessed are you when you go out will God give you
| Thy enemies shall swear before thee.
"In every deed of your hand, God will sanctify him for a holy people and see.
All the peoples of the earth and those who see you will open their mouths to you
The name to be monitored; Your country is in trouble)
Noim (many and nata to: a nat / lova
And be [up] and shall not be. [Lumta -> +
What .... [a] your daughter .- .. (The halzozom were converted to
Panna (M. Gogd Har Ebal and Yanuo Tiam) Ro (Bekel
Renam] Arr HaNeich Asher (Yesh / H. Panszel
And Metka. The [Indian] act of deafness was answered by all the people
Nakru a) from r (r the man a: a minister will do
Craft on the seventh day to desecrate and all the people answered
And (Mero Amen A) Rer Makla Abu and his mother answered
All the people and said Amen. Arr hits each other
Secretly and answered all
M and said Amen. Err
The man who will approach all the rest of his flesh and who.
He shall commit adultery with another, and shall marry with all
Beast and all the people answered and said Amen> Arr
And all the people answered and said, Amen.
Arr the man who swears in my name to lie and answer
All the people and said Amen. Arr took a bribe
To move Adushkar in his people and all the people answered and said
Artist. Arr the man who made a goat to
The wife of another and to his daughter and to his foster-mother] and to all
Which to him and all the people answered and said Amen. Err
The man who will hate the meadow in his heart and answer all
The people and said Essen. Arr the man who did not
Arise, all the words of the Lord.
You and all the people answered and said Amen. Winspo
The Levites read aloud and will say and was if not
You will easily hear your God [lesh: Mr. do all
His commandment went out and all the curse came upon you
The goddess Arr you are burning and Ar [r] you are in the wilderness
Arar Netonach and the rest of you Arar fruit in your belly
"You are in Bach" - Even Mr Google's finest should surely realise this is nonsense or somewhat painful and anachronistic.
"and said Amen> Arr" - Pirates?
I understand that translation is a hard problem but why not put in a post processor that looks for obvious flaws and calls out crap? It would surely not be too hard to get some basics fixed up. That could even feed back into the translation thingie to adjust it in some way. Even if it can't fix the problem the feedback mechanism can simply call out the aberration and mark it up or even delete it and replace with "work in progress" or whatever. It is disingenuous to produce crap. Bear in mind this might be used by those who can't read or understand either the source or the destination languages.
There is no way on earth you can convince me to allow a phrase like: "You are in Bach" to go unchallenged. The initial capitalisation of Bach implies that the translator has decided that it has seen the name Bach, ie the composer. It also attributes another set of squiggles to "You" - again it has bothered to capitalise things properly to account for the start of a sentence. So far so good and all grammatically fine. Then it loses the plot. How on earth can "you" be in "Bach"? This must be basic expert systems stuff.
I don't doubt that anti-Semitism had a role, but Shapiro had been caught selling forgeries before, so it was not suspicion based entirely on him being Jewish.
I dont think the shapira finds can really be said to have been dismissed out of anti semitism, after all his cheif critic was also a jewish person. Sure, the cartoons in the times use jewish stereotypes - but only for one of the two jews in them - and they both are well after the actual event , and so cannot be showing the motivations of those alleging forgery
It all seems very difficult to prove and the implications, a version of the Torah with most of the laws removed, just a little too convenient. Seems like healthy skepticism is warranted here.