> *Yes, because that part wasn't there* Neither was the part where they expected...

		PhasmaFelis on Oct 12, 2016 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Suspicious court cases, missing defendants, aim to... > Yes, because that part wasn't there Neither was the part where they expected "special treatment depending on their social status." You don't get to dismiss the author's suspicions as imaginary while elevating your own to fact.