>> This specifically is a survey where it's uncommon to carry out your own "experiments". You use the numbers from the original papers and hope there's some overlap in the metrics they use.
My comment was unclear. I wasn't criticizing the lit review, I was criticizing the literature it is reviewing. The lit surveyed does a poor job even defining metrics.
The rest is very interesting, and heartening. Thanks for the thoughtful response.
My comment was unclear. I wasn't criticizing the lit review, I was criticizing the literature it is reviewing. The lit surveyed does a poor job even defining metrics.
The rest is very interesting, and heartening. Thanks for the thoughtful response.